Houston, Texas
December 6, 2002
U S Rice Producers
Association reports the good news is that both total and per
capita U.S. rice consumption continues to rise but the bad news
is that imports account for a growing share of the domestic
consumption and according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) imports are projected to continue increasing at a
slightly faster pace than overall consumption. This is not the
kind of news that rice farmers want to hear.
The consumption of rice has been on an increase in the United
States since the late 1970s and for 2002/03 the per capita
consumption is projected by the USDA to reach a record 26.3
pounds. That is an increase of 1/4 pound from the previous year
and doubles the 1978/79 level. The USDA's long term forecast
projects continued expansion over the next decade. The factors
contributing to this expansion include a growing share of Asian
and Hispanic Americans, a greater demand for ethnic foods, a
variety of new rice products and some effective marketing tools.
Long grain rice accounts for the largest percentage of U.S.
consumption projected at a record 88.7 million cwt for 2002/03
while medium and short grain rice usage in the domestic market
is estimated at 36.3 million cwt.
"While 26.3 pounds per capita consumption is admirable, a
different picture is painted when you break this statistic
down," according to Dwight Roberts, President & CEO of the US
Rice Producers Association. According to the USDA the domestic
consumption figure includes not only table rice but usage in
processed foods, breakfast cereals, beer manufacturing, pet
foods and foreign imported rice. During a recent meeting with
the USDA, a senior economist stated that if you remove the
tonnage
accounted for by pet food, the brewery industry and imported
rice you have flat domestic table rice consumption. Added
Roberts, "this makes the 26.3 pounds per capita figure a very
misleading statistic for farmers and it indicates than your
average American is not eating the amount of rice we thought."
For American rice farmers who contribute hard earned check-off
dollars in promotional efforts, the importation of rice from the
foreign marketplace is of serious concern. As indicated by the
USDA, imports of approximately 13.2 million cwt in 2001/02
represented 11 percent of the domestic use, compared with less
than 1 percent in 1980/81. As well these imports are projected
to continue increasing at a pace faster than overall
consumption.
"As I talk to rice farmers in Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Missouri and California there is a consistent
concern in regards to the effective use of check-off dollars
that are designed to increase the consumption of American grown
rice," stated Roberts. "The time has come for the rice industry
to re-evaluate how check-off dollars are used in the domestic
marketplace and we owe it to our farmers to make the necessary
changes if we are going to participate in the expected expansion
in domestic usage," finalized Roberts.
The U S Rice Producers Association, representing rice farmers in
Mississippi, Missouri, Texas, Arkansas, California, and
Louisiana, is the only organization solely representing the
views of the U.S. rice farmers.
|