News section
Appeals court sets aside 780K Monsanto award in Mississippi dispute
ST. Louis, Missouri
April 29, 2004

Jim Suhr
Associated Press via Agnet April 29/04 - II


An appeals court has thrown out the $780,000 in damages a Mississippi farmer was ordered to pay Monsanto in a seed-patent dispute, calling the agriculture biotechnology giant's formula for calculating such damages "unenforceable" under Missouri law.

Under the ruling from a three-judge federal court panel in Washington, a judge or jury in Missouri must decide what Homan McFarling actually owes the company for saving and replanting genetically altered seeds in violation of an agreement with Monsanto.

The 30-page ruling, issued April 9, affirmed that McFarling, a soybean grower, infringed on St. Louis-based Monsanto's patent and breached his contract with the company.

"This ruling once again confirms that Monsanto's market approach to selling patented seed and traits is legal and enforceable," the company said Wednesday. "We now turn our attention to the jury trial to determine patent-infringement damages independent of the contract provision."

In November 2002, the St. Louis-based U.S. District Court for Missouri's eastern district ruled that McFarling violated a Monsanto-held seed patent and ordered him to pay the company $780,000 in damages, given his admission that he saved seeds after harvesting crops grown from Monsanto's patented Roundup Ready soybean seed.

In agreeing in writing to the prohibition when he first bought the seeds from Monsanto, McFarling also agreed that if he breached the deal he would have to pay damages of 120 times the $6.50-per-bag technology fee the company gets from each bag of soybeans sold.

Monsanto has filed more than 70 lawsuits against farmers in recent years over the issue. Monsanto first sued McFarling in 2000.

In its ruling this month, the federal appeals court declared the 120 multiplier "not a reasonable estimate of the harm that would be anticipated to flow from breach of the prohibition prohibiting replanting seed."

In a similar case a year ago, a Tennessee farmer opposed to Monsanto's genetic seed licensing practices was sentenced in a St. Louis federal court to eight months in prison for lying about a truckload of cotton seed he hid for a friend.

Kem Ralph's prison term for conspiracy to commit fraud was believed to be the first criminal prosecution linked to Monsanto's crackdown on farmers it claims have been violating agreements on using genetically modified seeds.
Ralph has been ordered to pay Monsanto more than $1.7 million.

Associated Press via Agnet April 29/04 - II

.

8524

Back to main news page

The news release or news item on this page is copyright © 2004 by the organization where it originated.
The content of the SeedQuest website is copyright © 1992-2004 by
SeedQuest - All rights reserved
Fair Use Notice