St. Louis, Missouri
January 30, 2004
Monsanto Company (NYSE: MON) announced today that at its
fourth annual meeting, shareowners elected three members of its
board of directors to new terms.
Frank V.
AtLee, Gwendolyn S. King and Sharon R. Long, Ph.D., were elected
to serve until the company's 2007 meeting.
Shareowners
also ratified the Board's Audit and Finance Committee's
appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the company's principal
independent auditor, and approved amendments to the Monsanto
Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Shareowners
voted down two shareowner proposals - one requested a report on
genetically engineered seed be compiled and communicated to
shareowners, and the second requested a report regarding
pesticides be provided to shareowners.
Shareowners
approved an additional shareowner proposal requesting that any
adoption, maintenance or extension of a poison pill for the
company be submitted for a shareowner vote. Monsanto does not
have a poison pill program and no intention to adopt such a plan
at this point, so the approved proposal has no immediate effect
of the company's policies. However, Hugh Grant, Monsanto's
chairman, president and chief executive officer, committed to
sharing the results of the vote with the full Board of Directors
in the event the Board considered any future shareowner rights
plans.
Monsanto
Company a leading global provider of technology-based solutions
and agricultural products that improve farm productivity and
food quality.
Monsanto defends biotech wheat plans,
eyes growth
By Carey Gillam
Reuters via Yahoo! News
Monsanto Co. Chairman Hugh Grant
on Thursday defended his company's plans to roll out the world's
first genetically modified wheat from critics who said they fear
it could endanger global food and environmental safety.
Grant, who was peppered with
questions about the company's biotech crops during Monsanto's
annual meeting at its headquarters, also offered an optimistic
outlook for the company's future success in marketing biotech
corn, soybeans, wheat and other crops.
The company's seeds businesses
will deliver "remarkable opportunities to farmers around the
world," Grant told shareholders.
He reiterated the company's
expectations for revenue gains of about 15 percent from its
biotech crops businesses, offsetting a similar decline in its
herbicide revenues, which are under intense competitive
pressure.
Many questions raised at
Thursday's meeting surrounded the company's efforts to launch
its "Roundup Ready" wheat, which has been genetically altered to
resist Monsanto's Roundup herbicide, helping farmers kill weeds
easier.
A number of foreign wheat buyers
have said they won't buy U.S. wheat if Roundup Ready wheat is
planted in this country, and Monsanto has pledged not to
commercialize in the United States until Canada and Japan also
approve the crop.
Many wheat industry players also
want Monsanto to wait until the European Union offers its
approval. But Grant said Thursday that was not something
Monsanto was prepared to do.
"That's like getting on a highway
that hasn't moved in five years," he said, citing the EU's ban
on approvals for biotech products that has been in place since
1998.
Grant acknowledged industry
concerns but said Monsanto was not likely to back away from its
biotech wheat.
"The Roundup Ready wheat piece is
provoking a healthy debate," Grant said. "But... these things
take time. It's foolish to think otherwise."
At the meeting, Susan Jordan,
coordinator of the Midwest Coalition for Responsible Investment,
presented a proposal asking Monsanto to detail the health risks
and environmental impacts of biotech seeds, particularly biotech
wheat.
She said research supporting
biotech seeds has not been independent but has been largely
funded by biotech companies, and she said there was evidence of
regulatory "gaps" that precluded adequate government evaluation
of biotech crops.
"Food is not merely another market
commodity. It is essential to life," Jordan said. "Companies
using this technology, including Monsanto, need to be
responsible, accountable and socially just.
Monsanto opposed the proposal to
provide such a report and shareholders' voted against it.
Shareholders also defeated a
proposal seeking a report on Monsanto's international sales of
pesticides that are banned in the United States.
A third shareholders' proposal was
successfully passed, requiring that the board seek shareholder
approval before implementing any plan that could prevent a
takeover, commonly referred to as a "poison pill" provision.
|