|
July 8, 2004
The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee of the United
Kingdom Parliament has today published a report into the
practical arrangements to be made following the Government’s
announcement in principle to permit the commercial cultivation
of GM crops in the United Kingdom.
Matters such as the details of
the regime which will allow GM and non-GM and organic crops to
co-exist, and of liability for contamination or admixture, still
have to be worked out. They will be the subject of a Government
consultation.
In the report the Committee
examines the areas in which consultation should concentrate.
These are primarily, at what level the threshold for
contamination or admixture of GM in non-GM or organic crops
should be set and how issues of liability should be approached.
The Committee argues that it is
important now to establish co-existence and liability regimes.
The Government may hope that now
that the decision in principle has been made it will be easier
to finalise the details of a planting regime. But the Committee
warns that it should be under no such illusions: it is apparent
that the prospect of agreement is remote.
RELATED
RELEASE
The Agricultural
Biotechnology Council (abc)
UK’s Agricultural Biotechnology Council
welcomes EFRA Committee’s call for momentum on “GM planting
regime”
The Agricultural
Biotechnology Council (abc) today welcomed the
Environmental, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee report on
“GM Planting Regime” especially their overriding intention that
the government must, in the near future, start the intended
consultation and then “establish co-existence and liability
regimes”.
abc Deputy Chairman Tony Combes said “abc concur with the
Committee’s view that the government has engaged in a “lengthy
process of testing and consultation about the cultivation of GM
crops” and said it was now time for the government to finalise
conditions that will allow UK farmers to benefit from GM crops
while not effecting other forms of Agriculture”.
He said abc supported the guidance of the EFRA committee in
defining “areas in which the consultation should concentrate”.
However, he went on to say “we do not agree with their
suggestion that “the prospect of agreement is remote” when most
stakeholders are actively looking for workable solutions”.
abc acknowledges that adventitious presence of 0.9% is the legal
threshold applicable within the EU and are happy to consult and
develop co-existence plans to ensure this level is met and help
to ensure that non-GM farmers are not impacted by the
introduction of GM crops.
Mr Combes said that the voluntary desire of some market sectors
to seek a lower limit (such as 0.1% for some sections of the
organic sector) for their own marketing purposes would place
unnecessary and unacceptably onerous requirements on GM farmers.
abc believe that those sectors of the market looking to supply
niche products below the legal limit accepted by the vast
majority, should maintain the responsibility to ensure their
self imposed voluntary limits are reached.
abc continue to look forward to the government-led consultation
process and remain confident that workable, practical and
proportionate measures can be put in place without new
legislation, to ensure all forms of agriculture can co-exist in
the UK.
In 18 other countries, 7 million farmers grow 167 million acres
of GM crops without the co-existence measures being proposed in
the EU. In the United States, where GM crops have been grown for
nearly 10 years, the organic market is growing at 20% annually
and is now worth $9 billion. (http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/NOPPresentation/IndustryStats.html)
The Agricultural
Biotechnology Council (abc) was set up in 2002 to provide a
forum for the debate and education surrounding GM technology in
the United Kingdom.
The members of abc are BASF, Bayer CropScience, Dow
AgroSciences, DuPont, Monsanto and Syngenta. These companies are
working together to promote a fair debate surrounding the
production of GM crops and also to provide education about GM in
the UK. |