News section
Supreme Court of Canada finds in favour of Monsanto in Schmeiser vs. Monsanto patent infringement case
Winnipeg, manitoba
May 21, 2004

Monsanto Canada today welcomed the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in ruling that the subject
matter claimed within its patent for Roundup Ready(R) canola falls within the Patent Act and that Mr. Percy Schmeiser and Schmeiser Enterprises Ltd. of Bruno, Saskatchewan infringed that patent.

"We are gratified the Supreme Court of Canada found that Monsanto's patent pertaining to the Roundup Ready gene is valid and enforceable," said Carl Casale, executive vice-president, Monsanto Company. "The Supreme Court has set a world standard in intellectual property protection and this ruling maintains Canada as an attractive investment opportunity. Patent protection encourages innovations that will lead to the next generation of value-added products for Canadian farmers."

Monsanto originally pursued this case in the Federal Court of Canada because Mr. Schmeiser knowingly infringed Monsanto's patents on Roundup Ready technology by planting 1,030 acres of Roundup Ready canola without paying the required license fee for using the technology. After reviewing all the evidence, Justice Andrew MacKay of the Federal Court of Canada did not find Mr. Schmeiser's explanation of the events credible and held him liable for infringing Monsanto's patent.

"More than 30,000 Canadian farmers have chosen our technology because of the economic and environmental benefits it brings," said Casale. "We believe the Supreme Court of Canada decision is good news for farmers and Canadians, all of who benefit from the innovative work that is going on across the country to produce more abundant, high quality food."

As a result of his infringement, Mr. Schmeiser will be required to comply with several remedies awarded by the Courts, including: (1) an injunction against Mr. Schmeiser and employees of Schmeiser Enterprises that prohibits planting, growing, cultivating, harvesting, selling, marketing or distributing the patented technology in the future; (2) an order to deliver to Monsanto any seed in Mr. Schmeiser's possession known to contain the Roundup Ready gene. However, the Supreme Court determined there was insufficient evidence that Mr. Schmeiser intentionally made use of the benefits provided by Monsanto's technology by spraying his crop with Roundup. Therefore, the Court has decided that both sides will be responsible for absorbing their own costs.

The Supreme Court of Canada decision exhausts all legal avenues available to Mr. Schmeiser as it relates to the March 29, 2001 judgment rendered by Justice Andrew MacKay of the Federal Court of Canada.

Monsanto Canada, based in Winnipeg, Manitoba, is a leading provider of technology-based solutions and agricultural products that improve productivity.


RELEASE from the SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA -- JUDGMENT IN APPEAL

OTTAWA, 21/05/04. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA HAS TODAY DEPOSITED WITH THE REGISTRAR JUDGMENT IN THE FOLLOWING APPEAL.
FROM: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (613) 995-4330
 
COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA -- JUGEMENT SUR APPEL
OTTAWA, 21/05/04. LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA A DÉPOSÉ AUJOURD'HUI AUPRÈS DE LA REGISTRAIRE LE JUGEMENT DANS L'APPEL SUIVANT.
SOURCE: COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA (613) 995-4330
    
COMMENTS/COMMENTAIRES: comments@scc-csc.gc.ca

 
29437        Percy Schmeiser and Schmeiser Enterprises Ltd. v. Monsanto Canada Inc. and Monsanto Company - and - Attorney General of Ontario, Canadian Canola Growers Association (CCGA), Ag-West Biotech Inc., BIOTECanada, Canadian Seed Trade Association, Council of Canadians, Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration, Sierra Club of Canada, National Farmers Union, Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, and International Centre for Technology Assessment (F.C.) 2004 SCC 34 / 2004 CSC 34

 
Coram:         McLachlin C.J. and Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour, LeBel, Deschamps and Fish JJ.

 
The appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-367-01, dated September 4, 2002, heard on January 20, 2004 is allowed in part, Iacobucci, Bastarache, Arbour and LeBel JJ., dissenting in part. The award for account of profit is set aside and, in all other respects, the trial judge's order is confirmed. Each party is to bear its own costs throughout.

L'appel interjeté contre l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel fédérale, numéro A-367-01, en date du 4 septembre 2002, entendu le 20 janvier 2004 est accueilli en partie. Les juges Iacobucci, Bastarache, Arbour et LeBel sont dissidents en partie. La remise des profits ordonnée est annulée et, à tous autres égards, la validité de l'ordonnance du juge de première instance est confirmée. Chaque partie assumera ses propres dépens dans toutes les cours.

Complete document: Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser

News release

Other news from this source

8753

Back to main news page

The news release or news item on this page is copyright © 2004 by the organization where it originated.
The content of the SeedQuest website is copyright © 1992-2004 by
SeedQuest - All rights reserved
Fair Use Notice