Halfway, Texas
September 15, 2004
Is there a better way to water
cotton using subsurface drip irrigation?
Research under way at the Helms Research Farm near here has
found that concentrating subsurface irrigation on smaller
acreages can increase cotton yields, water use efficiency and
returns per acre.
"We started this study in 2001. We are trying to figure out the
best strategy for installing and using subsurface drip
irrigation in cotton production," said Jim Bordovsky,
Texas Agricultural Experiment
Station agricultural engineer based at Halfway. "Should
producers stretch their limited irrigation water over a large
field and provide irrigation as a supplement to normal rainfall?
"Or can they get more bang for their irrigation buck by
concentrating their limited water resource on a smaller acreage?
That's the question in a nutshell."
Bordovsky conducts this research on the 373-acre Helms Research
Farm, adjacent to the Halfway Experiment Station in Hale County.
The Halfway Station is a substation of the Texas A&M University
System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Lubbock.
"Our prior experience with center pivot irrigation favored the
first scenario...spreading the water resource over an entire
field," Bordovsky said. "But the initial cost of installing a
subsurface irrigation system is much higher, so it makes sense
that concentrating that investment on a smaller acreage might
help boost returns and help recoup that cost faster."
A 12-acre drip irrigated field is the proving ground for this
study. The field is divided into ten zones of 1.2-acres each.
The "high maintenance" cotton grown in four of these zones
receives unlimited irrigation water, more fertilizer and intense
insect pest management. Cotton grown in another four zones is
"normal maintenance," receiving less water, nutrients and insect
management.
Two zones are grown dryland as a check/comparison for the other
scenarios.
"We are using two typical cotton varieties in this study.
Roundup Ready Paymaster 2326 in the normal and dryland
scenarios, and Bollgard Roundup Ready Fibermax 989 in the high
maintenance scenario treatments," Bordovsky said. "Each zone is
16 rows wide and 1,300 feet long. The subsurface drip lines were
installed on alternate furrows of 30-inch rows, about 10 to 12
inches beneath the bottom ofthe furrows."
"The Paymaster 2327 cotton received no more than 0.2 inches of
irrigation water per day, and we fertilized for a two and a
half- to three-bale per acre yield goal. We applied insect
control using thresholds that most farmers use," Bordovsky said.
"Meg Parajulee, Experiment Station research entomologist,
provides our pest management expertise."
The high-maintenance Fibermax cotton was fertilized for a four
bale per acre yield goal and received all the irrigation
necessary to meet its daily evaporative demand. It was scouted
for insects weekly and treatments were applied for fewer
insects. A growth regulator was also applied to keep plant
growth in check.
During two years of research, the "high maintenance" cotton
outperformed the "normal maintenance" cotton in total yield per
acre, water use efficiency and dollars returned per acre.
"Both years were extremely dry. Almost no appreciable rainfall
at all. Even so, in 2002 and 2003 our high-maintenance cotton
produced at least 400 more pounds of lint per acre than the
normal maintenance cotton," Bordovsky said. "And its water use
efficiency rating was higher by more than 10 pounds of lint per
acre-inch of seasonal irrigation applied.
"If we figure the increased value of the high-maintenance
treatment strictly on the cotton loan value, the return was $45
more per acre than the normal-maintenance cotton. We figured we
would see a difference, but the yield and return-per-acre we
noted was surprising."
Bordovsky, and research technicians Joe Mustian and Cody Mull
will continue the study for several years to generate a
long-term comparison between these two management strategies.
"Based on these preliminary results, installing subsurface drip
irrigation on a portion of a field and concentrating production
resources there helps maximize yields and returns per acre at a
lower investment cost," Bordovsky said. "That may be more
profitable in the long run than stretching subsurface drip
irrigation and limited production resources over a larger area."
Comparing the profitability and performance of different
irrigation strategies is not the only aspect of this work.
Bordovsky and other researchers are also studying cotton
germination and soil compaction with subsurface drip irrigation,
and strategies for minimizing problems such as emitter plugging.
They are also comparing the performance of 24 cotton varieties
grown with subsurface drip irrigation.
"John Gannaway, Experiment Station cotton breeder, has a variety
performance study using the high and normal maintenance
production scenarios," Bordovsky said. "That will help us get a
handle on how genetics respond to different management
strategies when irrigation water is limited."
The Texas State Support Committee of Cotton Incorporated and the
United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research
Service Ogallala Research Initiative provided financial support
for this study. |