Basel, Switzerland
July 14, 2005
By
Shelley Jambresic,
Checkbiotech
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a
naturally-occurring soil bacterium that causes tumours, or galls
on plants. For a long time it was widely considered that
Agrobacterium is the only bacterial genus capable of
transferring genes to plants. The discovery that this gall
formation is due to the integration of bacterial DNA into the
plant genome laid the foundations of plant biotechnology.
This ability to
transfer genes from bacteria to plants has been widely exploited
by researchers for genetic engineering and plant improvement.
Transgenic plants, like genetically modified maize, cotton or
soy, are plants that have been genetically engineered by adding
one or more genes to the plant’s genome. The majority of
transgenic plants cultivated for commercial use have had genes
added which confer resistance to insects and/or herbicides.
Most of the technologies involved, however, are ‘protected’ by
hundreds of patents worldwide, many of which are held by
multinational corporations. The complexity of the patent
landscape has formed very serious ‘real and perceived’ obstacles
to the effective use of these technologies for agricultural
improvements, both by small-medium enterprise in the
industrialized world, and by the developing countries. The
unfortunate industry consolidation this leads to has caused a
lack of public trust and transparency, which is a root of the
public disquiet about GMOs.
Most people think patent licenses are readily obtained by
purchasing a license. “The costs are not just simple
financials,” says Dr Richard A.
Jefferson from
CAMBIA, a
private international non-profit institute in Australia.
“Transaction costs – the time, money, energy and emotion
expended to even get to the negotiating table – can defeat a
project before it starts. Further, many patents are simply not
being licensed, and only one patent right withheld can block
progress.”
To address this problem, CAMBIA is creating new tools and
technologies to support innovation and collaboration in the life
sciences. One of CAMBIA's major activities is the
BIOS Initiative
(Biological Innovation for Open Society), which has parallels
with the open source software movement, but which is focussing
on patented technologies in the life sciences.
BioForge
is the associated internet-based platform for collaborative
research and development.
“A major goal of BIOS and the BioForge is to reduce transaction
costs, and free technology and patent blockages so that the
focus of innovators can be on innovation, not simply on ‘getting
to the starting gate’,” Jefferson told Checkbiotech.
Jefferson and his team recently published the observation that
several species of bacteria outside the Agrobacterium genus can
be modified to mediate gene transfer (Broothaerts et al, Nature
433:629-633).
“Our technology is patented – just as Linux is copyrighted – and
requires a special license for use, as does ‘free or open source
software’. However, these licenses are free as long as users
agree to share improvements with other users (Licensees), share
all biosafety data, agree that licensees may not assert rights
over improvements on other licensees.” This unique patent
license, called a BiOS license, serves as a useful template for
the CAMBIA-led open source movement.
Rather than using the pathogen Agrobacterium, the CAMBIA
researchers used the benign plant-associated bacteria
responsible for the symbiotic relationship between plants and
bacteria – the symbiosis between roots and Rhizobia. Rhizobia
are soil bacteria that ‘fix’ nitrogen from its inert molecular
form (N2), and convert it into nitrogenous compounds useful for
the plant. Jefferson and his research team modified these
plant-associated symbiotic bacteria, and made them competent for
the gene transfer by using ‘classical’ bacterial genetic
techniques.
The DNA transferred into the plant’s cell by Agrobacterium
tumefaciens is called transferred DNA (T-DNA). The T-DNA, while
in the bacterium, is located on the large and complex bacterial
tumour-inducing (Ti) plasmid. If the Ti-plasmid is removed from
the bacteria, the tumour growth, which normally results from
pathogenic infection by Agrobacterium, does not occur.
To use the Ti plasmid as a vector for inducing new genes into
plants, it is necessary to disarm the plasmid so that it does
not cause tumours. This task is accomplished by deleting the
genes on the Ti-plasmid, which encode the enzymes controlling
the synthesis of the plant growth hormones auxin and cytokinin.
A cloned gene encoding a new function can then be inserted into
the T-DNA region of the disarmed Ti plasmid. A more typical and
modern process puts the T-DNA on a separate, readily manipulated
plasmid called a binary vector.
The researchers further modified the Ti plasmid to allow it to
be more easily mobilized into a diverse group of Rhizobial
genera, including Rhizobum, Sinorhizobium and Mezorhizobium, and
tested the gene transfer on different plant species.
“With Arabidopsis, Heidi Mitchell at CAMBIA has already achieved
an efficiency about half that of the method with Agrobacterium
and we expect this will readily rise with some work by others
and us,” said Dr. Jefferson. “With tobacco it generates more
lines than we can sensibly monitor - so that's more than
enough.”
Experiments with rice were successful too, but showed lower
efficiency. However Dr. Jefferson is confident, “We're a very
small team. Putting our protocols and material in the BioForge,
and having the community explore new bacterial strains and new
conditions will together generate substantial increases in
efficiency in the very near future.” Dr. Jefferson also told
Checkbiotech that the team at CAMBIA has already increased the
frequency above that published in the Nature article in
February.
A significant advantage of the new method over the one with
Agrobacterium is that Rhizobial species are not pathogens,
allowing the plants to grow without the stresses associated with
Agrobacterium infection. This may also allow for the transfer of
genes into new target cells and tissues. Very good results were
obtained using the combination of Sinorhizobium with tobacco.
“Brian Weir, in our team, discovered that young leaves are more
susceptible to gene transfer by Sinorhizobium than older leaves,
whereas with Agrobacterium this makes little difference,”
explained Dr. Jefferson. This wide range of interactions may be
an advantage in transferring genes into other, previously
intractable, plant species or cell types. “With some work we
anticipate the number of gene transfer competent species to
greatly increase, using many benign plant-microbe interactions
as a basis for such gene transfer.”
However, for Dr. Jefferson and his team the important issue is
not only the efficiency or the used species, but also the whole
concept of rapid and unfettered use and improvement of the
technology by the larger community. “The power of ‘open source’
is in the highly-parallel, efficient and transparent development
and optimisation of conditions. There is now a ready mechanism
for this improvement to happen, and excellent motivation to do
so.”
About his team’s future plans, Dr. Jefferson further explained,
“Besides the optimization of these technologies, we’re looking
at new ways of using plants as living ‘instruments’ to allow
better management of nutrients and other scarce resources. We’re
also going to develop programs on the BioForge to build ‘open
source’ toolkits for such critical technologies as precise
‘homologous’ recombination.”
“Part of our effort over the next years will be in advocacy and
communications: spelling out how technology choice, development
and dissemination can have a major impact on contributions of
science and technology to social equity. It also has to be made
clear that such choices need not conflict with scientific
curiosity, career development or productive and fair business
strategies.”
Gene transfer to plants by diverse species of bacteria
Nature. 433, 629 - 633
10 February 2005 |