Lincoln, Nebraska
March 14, 2005
By Gillian Klucas
IANR News Service
For years, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln entomologist Leon Higley cautioned his
students against researching aphids. Despite 50 years of
research, no one had figured out how the tiny, agricultural
pests harmed plants. Fortunately for Higley, one of his graduate
students didn't take his advice.
Doctoral student Fikru Haile's initial findings launched Higley
and several Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources
colleagues into a new line of study that is debunking old
assumptions about aphids.
Smaller than a pumpkin seed, aphids attack wheat, soybeans, corn
and other crops, transmit diseases and cause more crop damage
than any other insect. "As a group, aphids are probably the
single most important agricultural pest worldwide," Higley said.
Because aphids cause plants to yellow, scientists have long
assumed they produce a toxin that affects plant cells'
chloroplasts, where photosynthesis happens. But the toxin had
never been found.
Normally in photosynthesis, the energy in sunlight charges, or
excites, molecules inside the chloroplasts. This energy is
passed along in a series of reactions and eventually leaves the
chloroplast as carbohydrates. In the process, the excited
molecules lose their energy.
By looking at what happens to aphid-infested plants over time,
instead of after yellowing as researchers had done in the past,
Higley found abnormalities before visible signs of injury
emerged.
"As silly as it is, that's probably the biggest thing we did to
help reveal what was going on," says Higley. "We started to see
things that people hadn't seen before."
Researchers also used fluorometry, which measures plants' energy
status. The combination of early inspection and fluorometry
revealed that aphids block energy from leaving the chloroplasts.
It is the buildup of excited molecules, not a toxin, that
eventually chews up the cells and causes visible damage.
Though Higley hasn't determined how aphids do this -- that's the
next step -- the discovery seems to hold true for most, if not
all, types of aphids.
The scientific implications are exciting, he said. It suggests a
single evolutionary event that may shed light on how aphids and
plants adapted to each other.
He's collaborating with colleague Tiffany Heng-Moss and others
who envision a single solution to agricultural losses across a
variety of crops and aphid species.
Heng-Moss is studying peroxidases, enzymes plants produce to
neutralize peroxides, which are created from excess energy in
the chloroplast. Because aphids block energy from leaving,
abnormally large amounts of peroxides are created. Most plants
can't sustain peroxidase production long enough to ward off an
aphid infestation and eventually perish.
But some can, and after aphids leave, these resistant plants
resume normal function. Finding the gene or genes that regulate
peroxidase production could be the answer to transferring
resistance to other plants, Heng-Moss said.
Scientists elsewhere have sequenced the peroxidase genes.
Heng-Moss is researching whether those genes are turned on in
response to insect feeding, as she suspects.
"If we find more activity of those genes in the resistant plants
than in the susceptible ones, then that would provide evidence
that they contribute to the resistance," she said.
If so, the next step will be transferring those genes into
susceptible plants.
Giving plants the ability to withstand aphids is a better
solution than killing the aphids, both entomologists said. Over
time, insects can develop resistance to chemical controls. But
allowing aphids to feed on but not kill the plant maintains a
natural balance.
Though they are years away from engineering resistant plants,
Higley and Heng-Moss believe they have found a simple solution
to a problem that had proved too complex to decipher for
decades.
The Nebraska soybean and sorghum boards, and the USDA regional
research funds support this IANR Agricultural Research Division
research. |