El Batan, Mexico
May 2, 2005
Shuttle
breeding for wheat, a strategy created by 1970 Nobel Peace
Laureate, Dr. Norman Borlaug, was put under the technical
microscope by CIMMYT’s team
of more than 30 wheat scientists in a forum held at the research
station in Ciudad Obregón, in the Yaqui Valley of Sonora State,
northwest Mexico, during 30 March-02 April. The issue? Does the
method still deliver the best new wheat varieties to the world’s
most vulnerable wheat farmers? The wheat group’s answer: Yes,
but...
In shuttle
breeding at CIMMYT, two different experiment stations in Mexico
are used back-to-back to develop new wheats. This is part of
conventional breeding—that is, the careful cross-pollination of
thousands of plants and the selection of offspring with
desirable traits. The two main locations used are the Ciudad
Obregón station, a dry site situated at sea level in northwest
Mexico, and Toluca, a cool highland environment near Mexico
City. Since day length, temperatures, diseases, and other
conditions differ radically between the two sites, wheat lines
that prosper at both are automatically adapted to many growing
environments. As an added bonus, by immediately moving the
selected seed from one location to the other, it is possible to
grow two generations a year, halving the time required for
developing a new variety.
However, CIMMYT’s
team of breeders, biotech specialists, pathologists,
physiologists, and agronomists has lately been applying
cutting-edge molecular breeding approaches to help deliver new,
relevant wheat varieties more quickly, and some felt that
certain of the new methods could provide the benefits of shuttle
breeding at a lower cost. In addition, most needy wheat farmers
that CIMMYT serves are located not in Mexico but in many other,
much more marginal settings of the developing world.
During
the Obregón meeting, the wheat group evaluated the shuttle
approach in round-table discussions that included input from
John Dixon, director of the Impacts Targeting and Assessment
Program, and considered data from geographic information
systems, international trials, genotype adaptation studies, and
economic analyses of shuttle breeding, to name a few areas of
expertise. This examination was prefaced by a lively email
debate to which CIMMYT wheat scientists worldwide contributed.
The conclusion?
The shuttle approach still gives good value for the investment,
especially in the early stages of breeding. But the group also
recommended that breeding of certain lines be moved closer to
their target areas, to maximize possible adoption in places with
very specific requirements.
The continued
relevance of one of CIMMYT’s most time-honored breeding
practices was one of several scientific questions intensely
debated at the Obregón event. According to wheat group leader,
Richard Trethowan, such discussions are part of CIMMYT’s
continuous efforts to deliver the best wheat science most likely
to impact the livelihoods of the rural poor. “In the next couple
months, the team will move forward on the plans we’ve made
here,” says Trethowan. “We’ll be tackling some of the key issues
confronting wheat improvement at CIMMYT today.” To achieve this,
they will focus on applying biotechnology, restoring training
programs, and improving partnerships, to name a few activities.
The meeting itself
was also a guinea pig to demonstrate and test a new way of
working together. As part of a
pilot project on better methods of knowledge management and
with the help of talented facilitators, the wheat group broke
with many traditional norms associated with scientific meetings.
Instead of formal presentations and other, often superfluous
practices, the group went back to the basics and met in an open
circle. After deciding their own agenda, the participants
dispersed into smaller discussions, mulled over topics, and
pinned down action plans. Among other outcomes, a special
on-line forum was created that allows the scientists to “get
together” no matter where they are.
“This was a very
fruitful exchange with colleagues,” says Julie Nicol, a CIMMYT
wheat pathologist based in Turkey, “I believe it served to
develop our science and improve wheat production systems, and I
look forward to future meetings.” |