Washington, DC
May 17, 2005
U.S.
General Accounting Office report:
USDA's Preparation for Asian
Soybean Rust
GAO-05-668R,
May 17, 2005
ABSTRACT
In November 2004, Asian Soybean
Rust (ASR) was discovered in the United States in Louisiana. In
the following weeks, it was found in eight additional southern
states. ASR is a harmful fungal disease that has spread
throughout many other parts of the world, including Asia,
Australia, Africa, and South America. ASR can infect over 90
host plant species, including legumes, such as dry beans, peas,
and kudzu, a plant that grows wild primarily in the southern
United States.
Although the disease has caused
significant soybean crop loss and increased production costs in
many other countries, ASR arrived in the United States too late
in the crop year to have any effect on soybean production in
2004, and scientists were uncertain about how it would survive
the winter climates in the United States.
However, in February 2005,
researchers found that ASR had successfully over-wintered on
kudzu in Florida, and it was subsequently detected in Georgia on
soybean plants in April 2005.
Since environmental factors,
such as rainfall, humidity, and temperature, affect both the
severity and incidence of ASR, scientists do not know how
widespread or damaging the disease will be in the United States
during the 2005 crop year. The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is responsible for monitoring and addressing the problems
posed by ASR.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is responsible for licensing fungicides to treat
the disease. Congress asked us to determine
(1) USDA's efforts to
develop and implement an ASR surveillance strategy to
identify and protect against ASR's entry into the United
States and to test and verify suspect cases;
(2) USDA's strategy for minimizing the effects of ASR now
that the fungus has arrived in the United States; and
(3) the progress that USDA, EPA, and others have made in
developing, testing, and licensing fungicides to treat ASR
and in identifying and breeding ASR-resistant or -tolerant
soybeans.
In May 2002, after ASR was
identified in Brazil, USDA began planning for the introduction
of ASR into the continental United States. Three USDA
agencies--the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS), the Cooperative State Research, Education, and
Extension Service (CSREES), and the Agricultural Research
Service (ARS)--the National Plant Board, industry, and several
land-grant universities formed an ad hoc Soybean Rust Committee.
At about the same time, USDA
established the National Plant Diagnostic Network to enable
diagnosticians, state regulatory personnel, and first detectors
to communicate information, images, and methods of detection for
ASR and other diseases in a timely manner.
In the fall of 2002, USDA began
disseminating information and conducting training courses in an
effort to educate growers about how to identify and manage the
disease. In January 2004, APHIS issued a strategic plan that
provided information on the protection, detection, response, and
recovery from ASR.
While generally comprehensive
in its coverage of issues, the plan was not fully developed when
ASR was first identified in the United States. Since the initial
discovery of ASR in the continental United States, USDA and
others have increased efforts to inform growers about how to
identify and minimize the effects of the disease.
In April 2005, USDA issued A
Coordinated Framework for Soybean Rust Surveillance, Reporting,
Prediction, Management and Outreach. The framework includes a
surveillance and monitoring network, a Web-based information
management system, decision criteria for fungicide application,
predictive modeling, and outreach efforts. We surveyed 31
soybean-producing states to obtain information about their
efforts, in coordination with USDA, to prepare for and manage
ASR.
The states generally responded
positively when discussing efforts to educate growers and others
on ASR and in setting up sentinel plot monitoring programs.
(Sentinel plots will be planted earlier than commercial plants
to alert growers if ASR is present in their region.)
However, some of the states
reported that their diagnostic laboratories may have
insufficient funding and/or staff to test suspected samples for
ASR. In addition, most states indicated that they were either
uncertain or did not believe they would have enough equipment
available to apply fungicides to treat the disease.
The American Soybean
Association, representing many of the nation's largest soybean
growers, has also expressed concerns about whether growers will
have access to equipment as well as fungicides in a timely
manner.
Finally, USDA's Risk Management
Agency has recently developed additional guidance on the actions
growers must take to ensure that any losses due to ASR are
covered under their insurance policies. However, growers have
expressed concerns about what they need to do to demonstrate
good farming practices in treating ASR and the documentation
they must provide to demonstrate that they followed such
practices.
Further guidance may be needed
because of the uncertainties associated in dealing with the
disease. USDA, EPA, and others have made significant progress in
developing, testing, and licensing fungicides to treat ASR. As
of April 2005, eight fungicides were registered with EPA for
treating ASR.
In addition, EPA had approved
emergency exemptions for an additional 11 fungicides to treat
ASR under section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act. As of April 2005, 32 states had applied for and
been granted section 18 exemptions that are effective through
November 10, 2007.
USDA estimates that researchers
are 5 to 9 years away from identifying or breeding ASR-resistant
or -tolerant soybeans. In addition, on March 10, 2005, USDA
removed ASR from the list of select agents and toxins, which
removed certain restrictions and will aid ongoing research on
the disease in the United States.
Complete
document in PDF format:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05668r.pdf |