Stuttgart, Arkansas
September 21, 2006
University of Arkansas System Vice President for Agriculture
Milo Shult today said that tests by an independent laboratory
found no genetically modified rice in samples of breeder seed or
foundation seed grown by the U of A system’s Division of
Agriculture over the past three years.
The division is a major supplier of foundation rice seed to seed
dealers. Arkansas produces about half of the rice grown in the
United States.
Transgenic rice varieties have been developed by seed companies
and certified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture as posing no
risk to public health or the environment, but they have not been
approved for commercial use due their potential impact on trade
with countries that prohibit the import of genetically modified
rice. About half of the Arkansas rice crop is exported.
In August, the USDA announced that trace amounts had been found
in the U.S. rice supply of the LLRICE601 protein that is present
in a non-commercial cultivar of transgenic rice developed by
Bayer CropScience. The USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service is searching for the source of the contamination.
The UA Division of Agriculture’s rice breeding program and
foundation seed program are based at the Rice Research and
Extension Center (RREC) near Stuttgart.
“We begin with a small amount of genetically pure seed from
plant breeders. We plant that seed and manage the fields very
carefully to produce genetically pure foundation seed for sale
to seed growers and dealers,” Shult said.
Seed companies then use the foundation seed to grow “certified”
and “registered” seed for sale to farmers. The process is
regulated by the Arkansas State Plant Board to assure that the
supply of seed for planting meets quality standards.
RREC Director Christopher Deren said, “Our policy is that we
don’t work with transgenic rice on the center.” The policy is to
eliminate the possibility of transgenic seed being accidentally
mixed with breeder or foundation seed, he said.
“We submitted samples of breeder and foundation seed from the
past three years to an independent laboratory for testing, and
the LLRICE601 protein was not detected in any sample,” Deren
said.
Deren said seed samples from RREC were tested by Biodiagnostics
of River Falls, Wis. They included foundation seed of the
varieties Cocodrie for 2004, ’05 and ’06; Wells for ’04, ’05 and
’06; Cybonnet for ’04, ’05 and ’06; Banks for ’04 and ’05;
Spring for ’05 and ’06; Francis for ’05 and ’06; and Cheniere
for 2006.
Breeder seed tested, all from 2006, were the varieties Wells,
Cybonnet, Spring, Francis and Cheniere. A sample of head row
seed of the CL171AR variety from 2005 was also tested. |