Parma, Italy
November 30, 2007
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (reference EFSA-GMO-UK-2004-04) for the placing on the market of glufosinate tolerant genetically modified rice LLRICE62 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer CropScience GmbH[1]
Question number: EFSA-Q-2004-145
Adopted date: 30/10/2007
Summary
This
document provides the opinion of the
Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified
Organisms (GMO Panel) of the
European
Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on the
genetically modified rice LLRICE62 (Unique
Identifier ACS OSØØ2-5), hereafter referred
to as LLRICE62 developed to provide
tolerance to glufosinate herbicides by
expressing the PAT protein encoded by the
bar gene.
In delivering its opinion the GMO Panel
considered the application
EFSA-GMO-UK-2004-04, additional information
provided by the applicant (Bayer CropScience
GmbH) and the scientific comments submitted
by the Member States. The scope of the
application is for food and feed uses,
import and processing of LLRICE62 and does
not include cultivation. The GMO Panel
assessed LLRICE62 with reference to the
intended uses and the appropriate principles
described in the guidance document of the
Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified
Organisms for the Risk Assessment of
Genetically Modified Plants and Derived Food
and Feed. The scientific assessment included
molecular characterization of the inserted
DNA and expression of the target proteins. A
comparative analysis of agronomic traits and
composition was undertaken and the safety of
the new proteins and the whole food/feed was
evaluated with respect to nutritional
quality, potential toxicity and
allergenicity. An assessment of
environmental impacts and the post market
environmental monitoring plan were
undertaken.
LLRICE62 was transformed, using particle
bombardment, to express the bar gene, which
encodes phosphinothricin acetyl-transferase
(PAT). PAT acetylates glufosinate and
thereby detoxifies the herbicide.
The molecular characterisation data
established that LLRICE62 contains only one
transgenic insert. The structure of the
insert in LLRICE62 was determined by
Southern analysis and DNA sequencing. No
vector backbone sequences or antibiotic
resistance marker genes were detected.
Examination of the transgene locus and the
plant-DNA junctions revealed 19 putative
Open Reading Frame (ORF) sequences. Analysis
of these ORFs was performed by bioinformatic
analysis and no significant homologies were
identified with known toxins or allergens or
with rice genes of known function. The
expression of the genes introduced by
genetic modification has been sufficiently
analysed and the stability of the genetic
modification has been demonstrated over
several generations.
The GMO Panel is of the opinion that the
molecular characterisation of the DNA insert
and flanking regions of LLRICE62 does not
raise safety concerns, and that sufficient
evidence for the stability of the insert
structure was provided.
Based on the results of compositional
analysis of samples from a representative
range of environments and seasons, the GMO
Panel concluded that both rough LLRICE62
(synonym: paddy rice, including hulls), and
its processed products are compositionally
equivalent to those of conventional rice,
except for the presence of PAT protein. In
addition, field trials did not reveal any
unexpected changes in agronomic performance
and phenotypic characteristics.
The PAT protein induced no adverse effects
in acute and repeated dose oral toxicity
studies in rodents. In addition, PAT is
rapidly degraded in simulated gastric fluid
and inactivated during heat treatments.
A 42-day feeding study on broilers and a
96-day study on growing-finishing pigs did
not indicate differences in the nutritional
value of LLRICE62 compared with the non-GM
comparator. These animal studies support the
compositional analysis which indicated no
unintended effects.
The application EFSA-GMO-UK-2004-04 concerns
food and feed uses, import and processing of
LLRICE62. There is therefore no requirement
for scientific information on possible
environmental effects associated with
cultivation. Accidental release of viable GM
paddy rice into the environment is possible
and GM seeds could be dispersed into land
cultivating rice and establish GM
populations, which could outcross with
non-GM cultivated or weedy rice plants. The
GMO Panel concluded that there is a
possibility that small numbers of GM rice
plants could enter cultivation and
cross-pollinate with cultivated or weedy
rice. However it is unlikely that spillage
will result in feral plants establishing
around ports, mills, and transit routes as
there is no indication of changes in fitness
or behaviour of this GM rice, except in the
presence of glufosinate.
The GMO Panel advised that appropriate
management systems should be in place to
prevent seeds of LLRICE62 entering
cultivation. The monitoring plan provided by
the applicant is in line with the intended
uses of LLRICE62. Furthermore the GMO Panel
agrees with the reporting intervals proposed
by the applicant in the general surveillance
plan.
In conclusion, the GMO Panel considers that
the information available for LLRICE62
addresses the scientific comments raised by
the Member States and that LLRICE62 is as
safe as its non-GM comparator with respect
to potential effects on human and animal
health or the environment. Therefore the GMO
Panel concludes that LLRICE62 is unlikely to
have any adverse effect on human and animal
health or on the environment in the context
of its intended uses.
[1] For citation purposes: Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (reference EFSA-GMO-UK-2004-04) for the placing on the market of glufosinate tolerant genetically modified rice LLRICE62 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer CropScience GmbH . The EFSA Journal (2007) 588, 1-25.