News section
home news forum careers events suppliers solutions markets resources directories advertise contacts search site plan
 
.
Application (Reference EFSA-GMO-NL-2007-37) for the placing on the market of the insect-resistant genetically modified maize MON89034, for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto[1] - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms

.

Parma Italy
December 3, 2008

Source: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Question number: EFSA-Q-2007-042
Adopted date: 3 December 2008

Summary

This document provides an opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on genetically modified maize MON89034 (Unique Identifier MON-89Ø34-3) developed to provide resistance to certain insect pests.

In delivering its scientific opinion, the GMO Panel considered the new application EFSA-GMO-NL-2007-37, additional information provided by the applicant (Monsanto) and the scientific comments submitted by the Member States. The scope of application EFSA-GMO-NL-2007-37 is for food and feed uses, import and processing of maize MON89034 and all derived products, but excluding cultivation in the EU.

The GMO Panel assessed maize MON89034 with reference to the intended uses and the appropriate principles described in the Guidance Document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. The scientific assessment included molecular characterisation of the inserted DNA and expression of the new proteins. A comparative analysis of agronomic traits and composition was undertaken and the safety of the newly expressed proteins and the whole food/feed was evaluated with respect to potential toxicity, allergenicity and nutritional quality.

An assessment of environmental impacts and the post-market environmental monitoring plan was undertaken.

Maize MON89034 was transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer technology. Maize MON89034 contains the Cry1A.105 and the Cry2Ab2 expression cassettes (T-DNA I) but does not contain the nptII expression cassette (T-DNA II). The Cry1A.105 and the Cry2Ab2 expression cassettes confer resistance to certain insect pests.

The molecular characterisation data established that a single insert with one copy of the intact T-DNA I expression cassette is integrated in the maize genomic DNA. Appropriate analyses of the integration site including sequence determination of the inserted DNA and flanking regions and bioinformatic analysis have been performed. Bioinformatic analysis of junction regions demonstrated the absence of any potential new ORFs coding for known toxins or allergens. The expression of the genes introduced by genetic modification has been sufficiently analysed and the stability of the genetic modification has been demonstrated over several generations. The GMO Panel is of the opinion that the molecular characterisation of the DNA insert and flanking regions of maize MON89034 does not raise any safety concern, and that sufficient evidence for the stability of the genetic modification was provided.

Based on the results of compositional analysis of samples from a representative range of environments, the GMO Panel concludes that forage and kernels of maize MON89034 are compositionally equivalent to those of the non-GM control and other conventional maize, except for the presence of the Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 proteins. In addition, field trials did not show changes in phenotypic characteristics and agronomic performance except for the introduced traits.

No indications of adverse effects related to the exposure to the Cry1A.105 protein or the Cry2Ab2 protein were found in studies on acute oral toxicity in mice. There were no adverse effects in a 90-day feeding study with rats fed diets including kernels from maize MON89034. A feeding study on broiler chickens provided evidence of nutritional equivalence of maize MON89034 to conventional maize. In addition, the overall allergenicity of the whole plant is not changed. The GMO Panel is of the opinion that maize MON89034 is as safe as conventional maize. Maize MON89034 and derived products are unlikely to have any adverse effect on human and animal health in the context of the intended uses.

The application for maize MON89034 concerns food and feed uses, import and processing of maize MON89034 and all derived products, but excluding cultivation in the EU. There is therefore no requirement for scientific assessment of possible environmental effects associated with the cultivation of maize MON89034. Considering the scope of the application, not for cultivation, the GMO Panel is of the opinion that the likelihood of the spread and establishment of maize MON89034 is very low and that unintended environmental effects due to this maize will be no different from that of conventional maize varieties. The scope of the post-market environmental monitoring plan provided by the applicant is in line with the intended uses of maize MON89034. The monitoring plan provided by the applicant is in line with the EFSA Guidance Document and the Opinion of the GMO Panel on post-market environmental monitoring.

In conclusion, the GMO Panel considers that the information available for maize MON89034 addresses the scientific comments raised by the Member States and that the GM maize MON89034 is as safe as its non genetically modified counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health or the environment. Therefore the GMO Panel concludes that maize MON89034 is unlikely to have any adverse effect on human or animal health or on the environment in the context of its intended uses.

[1] For citation purposes: Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on application (Reference EFSA-GMO-NL-2007-37) for the placing on the market of the insect-resistant genetically modified maize MON89034, for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto. The EFSA Journal (2008) 909, 1-3


OPINION
: Opinion (PDF)
 

 

 

 

The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originated - Fair use notice

Other news from this source


Copyright © SeedQuest - All rights reserved