Mississippi State, Mississippi
November 6, 2008
Mississippi soybean growers
wrapped up another year’s battle with soybean rust without yield
losses to the disease, even though it was found in 79 of the
state’s 82 counties.
Tom Allen, an Extension plant pathologist at
Mississippi State University’s
Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, has been part
of the team monitoring the disease since 2007. He announced Nov.
1 that soybean rust had been found in all counties except
Hancock, Harrison and Stone counties in South Mississippi.
“We can safely say we escaped almost completely unscathed with
regards to soybean rust for the soybean season,” Allen said.
“The crop is 95 percent to 98 percent harvested, and I don’t
think we lost a single bushel to soybean rust this year. That’s
four years in a row the state has had zero bushels lost due to
soybean rust.”
|
 |
For the last four years, the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
through the Risk Management Association, has provided funding to
support the extensive, national scouting conducted for soybean
rust. That funding runs out Dec. 31, and no other funding has
yet been found to replace this program.
This year, the state had soybeans growing in 77 counties, and
rust was found in 76 of these. Rust was found only on kudzu in
three counties, and Hancock was the state’s only soybean-growing
county where rust was not found. In all, more than 1,200 unique
locations were scouted across all 82 counties.
“This is the highest number of positive counties we’ve had to
date, and it is one county more than three times what we had in
2007,” Allen said.
“The question can be asked if there has been better scouting for
rust or more rust, and I can safely say there is more rust out
there.”
Alabama, Louisiana, Arkansas and South Carolina each had more
counties positive for rust in 2008 than in 2007, but several
other states had fewer instances of rust found this year than
the previous year.
To date, soybean rust has appeared late enough in the season
that the Extension Service has never suggested blanket fungicide
applications across vast numbers of acres. In 2008, Extension
experts suggested applying an appropriate fungicide in a few key
locations with late-planted, post-flood soybeans infected with
rust. This year a few producers decided on their own to spray
certain fields with fungicide for the disease, but in most
cases, the beans were well past the growth stages where rust
could have impacted yields.
“This year was the first time we’ve ever found rust on soybeans
younger than approximately R5.5 in Mississippi,” Allen said.
“This year we found rust on R3/R4 soybeans and on beans in the
V-stages. Soybeans are more tolerant to rust in the V-stages,
but if there is a large amount of inoculum present in the area,
beans can become infected.”
This year was the first time rust was found on commercial
soybean fields before scouts detected it in sentinel plots. Part
of this was because wet weather prevented sentinel plots from
being planted as early as planned.
Trey Koger, Extension soybean specialist, said this year’s
later-planted soybean crop and cool, wet weather in August and
early September provided good conditions for rust.
“We had quite a bit of rust in the state by the end of September
and October,” Koger said. “But because it developed late, the
disease had no significant impact on the state’s soybean crop.”
There is no way to predict what will happen in 2009 based on
what happened this year. Soybean rust cannot overwinter in
Mississippi because cold weather kills kudzu, a rust host, and
any stray soybeans left in the state. Each year, the disease
must blow into the state on weather currents from more southern
areas.
“Just because we have found soybean rust in a particular
location, either a soybean field or kudzu patch, does not mean
that it will be back in that location next season,” Allen said. |
|
