home news forum careers events suppliers solutions markets expos directories catalogs resources advertise contacts
 
Position Announcements

Career Center
Company index
All Africa Asia/Pacific Europe Latin America Middle East North America
JOB OFFERS
  Topics
All categories
Internships
Academia
Administration
Agricultural economist
Agronomy
Artificial intelligence
Biochemistry
Biodiversity
Bioinformatics
Biologicals & inoculants
Biotechnology
Business analysis
Business development
Cell biology
Communication
Crop advisor
Crop physiology
Crop protection
Customer service
Data science
Digital agriculture
Education & careers
Engineering & Technology
Extension
Farm management
Field operations
Financial
Genome-editing technology
Genomics
Genotyping
Greenhouse operation
Human resources
Indoor agriculture
Intellectual property protection
IT / Software development
Lab operations
Legal & regulatory
Licensing
Lighting technology
Logistics
Management
Marker-assisted breeding
Marketing
Microbiology
Molecular biology
Molecular breeding
Molecular genetics
Operations
Phenotyping / Phenomics
Plant biology
Plant breeding
Plant health
Plant pathology
Plant physiology
Plant tissue culture
Plant transformation
Post-harvest technology
Postdoctoral positions
Product development
Product management
Production
Production research
Project management
Quality assurance
Regulatory
Research
Research engineer
Research station management
Sales
Seed analysis
Seed colorants & polymers
Seed enhancement
Seed health
Seed physiology
Seed processing
Seed science & technology
Seed testing
Seed treatment
Soil science
Statistical Geneticist
Stewardship
Supply chain management
Sustainable ag
Technical services
Training
Trait engineering
Trial management
Vegetable crops
Weed management
JOB SEEKERS
Submit resume

Growth of biofuel industry hurt by GMO regulations



Corvallis, Oregon, USA
October 1, 2010

Faster development of the promising field of cellulosic biofuels – the renewable energy produced from grasses and trees – is being significantly hampered by a “deep and thorny regulatory thicket” that makes almost impossible the use of advanced gene modification methods, researchers say.

In a new study published today in the journal BioScience, scientists argue that major regulatory reforms and possibly new laws are needed to allow cellulosic bioenergy to reach its true potential as a form of renewable energy, and in some cases help reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming.

“It’s extraordinary that gene modification technology, which has been adapted more rapidly than any other technology in the history of agriculture, and had some profound environmental and economic benefits, has been regulated virtually out of existence for perennial cellulosic biofuels crops,” said Steve Strauss, a distinguished professor of forest biotechnology at Oregon State University, and lead author of the paper.

In the report, the authors noted that exotic plant species pose a serious risk of spread and ecosystem impacts, but face much less stringent regulation or obstacles than genetically engineered crops, which are carefully designed to solve problems, not cause them.

A genetically modified plant in which one or a few genes have been changed is treated as more of a risk than an invasive species that has thousands of new genes, and as a result is often resistant to multiple pests and has novel adaptive traits such as drought and heat tolerance, theCompanies that have the technical expertise to conduct advanced research have been forced to stay away from gene modification methods, rather than adopt them to speed breeding progress and insert novel traits important to the growing biofuels industry.

Traits that could be improved with gene modification include enhanced stress tolerance, reduced costs of conversion to liquid fuels, reduced use of water and fertilizer in cultivation, avoiding dispersal into the environment, and synthesis of new, renewable products such as industrial enzymes.

But virtually none of that potential is now being developed, they said.

The current environment poses enormous legal risks that can and have cost some companies millions of dollars in civil lawsuits, the scientists said, sometimes for damages that were more of perception and market issues, than of safety or environmental impact.

“Even research on traits expressly intended to reduce environmental impacts face the same legal risks and regulatory barriers as other traits,” Strauss said. “Our own federally-funded research on means to promote ecological containment of gene-modified and exotic biofuel crops has been brought to a standstill by regulations.”

The scientists said that the end result of a gene modification project – the trait produced, and whether it is safe and beneficial or not – should be the primary consideration for regulation, not the process used to produce it. Low-level risk and high benefit projects should be identified and allowed to move forward with much less stringent regulation or none at all. They also made several other suggestions for reform to make the overall system less slow, costly and uncertain.

“It is essential that we create an intelligent regulatory system that does not indiscriminately penalize the gene modification process and obstruct essential field research,” Strauss said. “The one-size-fits-all style system of today treats the process of genetic modification as inherently dangerous, although many high-level science panels have concluded that the process is at least as safe as conventional breeding methods.”

In some cases, the stringent regulations make it virtually impossible to do the very research needed to adequately understand issues of value and safety, the researchers said.

“The regulations in place, forthcoming, and those that have been imposed by legal actions result in the presumption that all forms of gene modified trees and grasses are ‘plant pests’ or ‘noxious weeds’ until extensive experimentation and associated documentation ‘prove’ otherwise,” the scientists wrote in their report.

Solving these problems will require new ways of thinking and strong scientific and political leadership to create a regulatory system that enables, rather than arbitrarily blocks, the use of gene modification as a tool to accelerate and diversify the breeding of perennial biofuel crops, the researchers concluded.

More positions from: Oregon State University

Posted from October 1, 2010 until -
SeedQuest reference number: 11014

 
 
Featuring jobs at
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

and many other outstanding employers
around the world


Copyright @ 1992-2024 SeedQuest - All rights reserved 

 
 
 
Also featuring
jobs at
 
 
 
 
 
 
and