Scientific Opinion on objections of a Member State to a notification (Reference C/NL/13/01) for the placing on the market of the genetically modified carnation SHD-27531-4 with a modified colour, for import of cut flowers for ornamental use, under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC from Suntory Holdings Limited
Parma, Italy
November 10, 2014
Type: Opinion of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel
On request from: European Commission
Question number: EFSA-Q-2014-00446
Adopted: 22 October 2014
Published: 10 November 2014
Affiliation: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy
Abstract
The European Commission asked the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) to address the objections of Cyprus to the placing on the market of the genetically modified (GM) carnation SHD-27531-4. The GM carnation cut flowers, with a modified petal colour, are intended to be imported and distributed in the European Union for ornamental use only. The EFSA GMO Panel responded to the objections of Cyprus, taking into account the limited intended use of carnation SHD-27531-4 and the information available. First, the EFSA GMO Panel concludes that the propagation of carnation SHD-27531-4 by individuals cannot be excluded. However, should this occur, carnation SHD-27531-4 would not show any potential for increased survival, fitness or weediness compared with its parental line. Second, the EFSA GMO Panel is of the opinion that the potential spread of pollen of the GM carnation SHD-27531-4 by Lepidoptera to wild Dianthus species cannot be eliminated but is highly unlikely to occur and, if it did occur, it is very unlikely that viable hybrids would be produced, survive and result in adverse environmental effects. Third, considering the very low potentials for hybridisation and/or seed production of (GM) carnations, the EFSA GMO Panel concludes that plant-to-plant gene transfer of the introduced genes is very unlikely and, if it did occur, it is unlikely to result in viable seed production leading to adverse environmental effects.
© European Food Safety Authority, 2014
Summary
In accordance with the procedure laid down in Directive 2001/18/EC, the European Commission asked the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) to address the objections raised by Cyprus to notification C/NL/13/01 on the genetically modified (GM) carnation SHD-27531-4. The GM carnation cut flowers, with a modified petal colour, are intended to be imported and distributed in the European Union for ornamental use only.
In delivering the present scientific opinion, the EFSA GMO Panel considered information provided in notification C/NL/13/01, the report on the initial environmental risk assessment carried out by the competent authority of the Netherlands, relevant scientific publications and the experience gained in assessing GM carnations with similar traits.
Considering the scope of notification C/NL/13/01 and the available information, the EFSA GMO Panel concludes that:
- The propagation of carnation SHD-27531-4 (e.g. rooting) by individuals cannot be excluded. However, should this occur, carnation SHD-27531-4 would not show any potential for increased survival, fitness or weediness compared with its parental line.
- The potential spread of pollen of the GM carnation SHD-27531-4 by Lepidoptera to wild Dianthus species cannot be eliminated but is highly unlikely to occur and, if it did occur, it is very unlikely that viable hybrids would be produced, survive and result in adverse environmental effects.
- Taking into account the very low potentials for hybridisation and/or seed production of (GM) carnations, plant-to-plant gene transfer of the introduced genes is very unlikely and, if it did occur, it is unlikely to result in viable seed production leading to adverse environmental effects.
More news from: European Union - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Website: http://www.efsa.europa.eu Published: November 12, 2014 |
The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originated Fair use notice |