Davis, California
October 27, 2005
The legendary UC-Blackwelder tomato
harvester, which arguably saved California's processed tomato
industry in the 1960s and raised concerns that machines were
depriving people of employment, was recently designated a historic
landmark during ceremonies at the
University of California, Davis.
That honor was bestowed by the American Society of Agricultural and
Biological Engineers, and coincided with the dedication of UC Davis'
Joe A. Heidrick, Sr. Western Center for Agricultural Equipment. The
ceremonies were held October 7 and 8, respectively.
The harvester becomes the society's 45th historic landmark, joining
such icons as John Deere's steel moldboard plow, the McCormick
Reaper, Eli Whitney's cotton gin, the row-crop tractor and the
self-propelled combine. In California, it is the sixth such
landmark, along with the Holt track-type tractor and steep-slope
combine, the Rainbird sprinkler, FMC's continuous rotary sterilizer
for canned goods and the roll-over protective structure for
tractors, which also was developed, in part, at UC Davis.
"The tomato harvester is a perfect example of the shared history of
agricultural engineering and biology," said Bruce Hartsough, chair
of the UC Davis Department of Agricultural and Biological
Engineering.
"It required the parallel collaborative development of tomato
varieties that were resistant to mechanical damage, were easily
detached from the vine and ripened uniformly."
In 1949, UC Davis agricultural engineer Coby Lorenzen teamed up with
UC Davis vegetable crops researcher Jack Hanna to develop a
harvester and a tomato variety that could withstand the rigors of
mechanical picking. Hanna had initiated the work on tomato varieties
several years earlier. Engineering the equipment was no small
challenge because tomato harvesting requires multiple functions,
including cutting and lifting the vines, then separating the
tomatoes from the vines.
During the 1950s, the UC Davis team refined the experimental
harvester and in 1959 convinced Blackwelder Manufacturing of Rio
Vista to commercialize the design.
"Mechanical harvesting was controversial because it seemingly
displaced human labor," said Hartsough. "However, by reducing
harvesting costs by nearly one half, the harvester eliminated an
economic constraint on the U.S. processing tomato industry,
resulting in large increases in tomato acreage and yield. Those
increases, in turn, provided additional employment in field work,
transportation and processing that more than offset the displaced
harvesting jobs."
The Western Center for Agricultural Equipment was completed in 2001
and named in honor of the late Joe A. Heidrick Senior, a longtime
Yolo County farmer and agricultural equipment innovator. The center
was made possible by donations of more than $2 million from the
Heidrick family and many others involved with agriculture. It
provides facilities for UC Davis' machinery-oriented courses, for
research and for training of the equipment industry's personnel.