St. Louis, Missouri
February 27, 2004
The American
Soybean Association (ASA) welcomes a scientific review
published February 23 by the
United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). The document
titled, "Status of Scientific Evidence on Risks Associated
with the Introduction into the Continental United States of
Phakopsora pachyrhizi With Imported Soybean Grain, Seed and
Meal," provides a concise summary of current data while
identifying significant knowledge gaps about the risk of
accidental introduction of Asian soybean rust disease into the
United States as a result of soy imports from rust infected
countries.
"APHIS’
scientific review is useful in examining the state of existing
knowledge about soybean rust, and it clearly demonstrates the
need for additional information in several key areas to
determine whether commodity soybeans can be imported safely from
rust-infected countries," said ASA Chairman Dwain Ford, a
soybean producer from Kinmundy, Illinois. "ASA believes these
questions need to be answered, based on the best-available
science, before a Pest Risk Analysis for soybeans and procedures
governing imports of commodity soybeans from rust-infected
countries are issued by USDA."
Since rust
spores can survive for extended but yet unknown periods of time
in vegetative material or on the surface of soybeans, the period
of time rust spores remain viable in light, humidity, and other
conditions in which soybeans typically are stored in
rust-infected countries is one of the key questions that must be
answered. Previous studies have indicated that rust spores can
remain viable for 45 days or more. ASA understands that
scientists of USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) will
soon be conducting experiments to answer this important
question, and ASA has previously submitted to APHIS a series of
questions probing this particular issue. ASA also has questions
about the potential for re-contamination during the various
transfer and loading stages.
While
questions remain unanswered about whether soybeans can be
imported safely from rust-infected countries, APHIS’ scientific
review documents that rust spores are destroyed by the heat and
other processes used to convert whole soybeans into soybean meal
and soybean oil. ASA believes that any final Pest Risk Analysis
or import protocols governing soybean meal imports from
rust-infected countries must require that any foreign material
intended to be added back into soymeal undergo heat treatment to
destroy any rust spores that might be present. ASA also believes
that finished soybean meal must be handled in such a manner as
to prevent contamination with viable rust spores.
With regard
to planting seed, APHIS’ scientific review documents that
soybean rust is not a disease that infects the seed or seed
coat, but rather is present in vegetative material or
potentially on the outer surface of seeds. For this reason, ASA
believes that import protocols governing soybean planting seed
imports should require that the seed be clean and free of
vegetative material. APHIS’ scientific review states that
soybean seed is treated with a fungicide as a normal commercial
practice. ASA therefore believes that APHIS should require the
fungicide treatment of seed from rust-infected countries.
Soybean
rust (P. pachyrhizi) is listed as a select biological
agent that is under official control to prevent its introduction
into the continental U.S., and is therefore considered a
quarantine pest subject to phytosanitary measures. APHIS
acknowledges that an updated, national, comprehensive economic
analysis of a major U.S. infestation of soybean rust will
require a much more involved analysis than was presented in the
February 23 report.
"ASA
continues to examine the scientific review in detail," Ford
said. "ASA’s goal is to protect the U.S. soybean industry from
the accidental introduction of soybean rust via imports, while
ensuring that decisions are based on science. Decisions or
import restrictions that aren’t science-based could come back to
hurt us as a global soy exporter, or could serve to choke-off
domestic livestock demand. Neither is in the interests of U.S.
soybean growers."
"Based on
APHIS’ scientific review, soybean meal and planting seed can be
imported safely if handled under the proper protocols," Ford
continued. ASA urges APHIS to make ASA’s recommendations part of
any import protocols governing soybean meal and soybean planting
seed imports, so that the U.S. soy industry is safeguarded from
the accidental introduction of soybean rust. ASA’s position on
soybean imports, however, is that key scientific questions must
be answered before any soybean import protocol is issued by
APHIS, and before any potential commodity soybean imports from
rust-affected countries are contemplated." |