|
September 26, 2006
Source:
Proceedings ot the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Link:
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0603228103v1?etoc
Steven B. Cannon, Lieven
Sterck, Stephane Rombauts, Shusei Sato, Foo Cheung, Jérôme
Gouzy, Xiaohong Wang, Joann Mudge, Jayprakash Vasdewani, Thomas
Scheix, Manuel Spannagl, Erin Monaghan, Christine Nicholson,
Sean J. Humphray, Heiko Schoof, Klaus F. X. Mayer, Jane Rogers,
Francis Quétier, Giles E. Oldroyd, Frédéric Debellé, Douglas R.
Cook, Ernest F. Retzel, Bruce A. Roe, Christopher D. Town,
Satoshi Tabata, Yves Van de Peer, and Nevin D. Young
ABSTRACT
Genome sequencing of
the model legumes, Medicago truncatula and Lotus
japonicus, provides an opportunity for large-scale
sequence-based comparison of two genomes in the same
plant family. Here we report synteny comparisons
between these species, including details about
chromosome relationships, large-scale synteny blocks,
microsynteny within blocks, and genome regions lacking
clear correspondence. The Lotus and Medicago
genomes share a minimum of 10 large-scale synteny
blocks, each with substantial collinearity and
frequently extending the length of whole chromosome
arms. The proportion of genes syntenic and collinear within
each synteny block is relatively homogeneous.
Medicago-Lotus comparisons also indicate similar
and largely homogeneous gene densities, although
gene-containing regions in Mt occupy 20-30%
more space than Lj counterparts, primarily because of
larger numbers of Mt retrotransposons. Because
the interpretation of genome comparisons is
complicated by large-scale genome duplications, we
describe synteny, synonymous substitutions and phylogenetic
analyses to identify and date a probable whole-genome
duplication event. There is no direct evidence for
any recent large-scale genome duplication in either
Medicago or Lotus but instead a
duplication predating speciation. Phylogenetic comparisons place
this duplication within the Rosid I clade, clearly after
the split between legumes and Salicaceae (poplar).
Link:
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0603228103v1?etoc
|